Alright, let's apply some critical analysis to this:
A few days ago, Matt Mullenweg (the CEO of Automattic, Tumblr’s parent company) responded to a user’s ask about an account suspension in a way that negatively affected Tumblr’s LGBTQ+ community.
It did negatively affect Tumblr's LGBTQ+ community, but the particular group most affected were trans women, and to simply use the umbrella term LGBTQ+ and not mention trans women specifcally detracts from the reality of the situation.
The reality of predstrogen's suspension was not accurately conveyed, and made it seem like we were reaching for opportunities to ban trans feminine people on the platform. This is not the case. The example comment shared in the post linked above does not meet our definition of a realistic threat of violence, and was not the deciding factor in the account suspension.
So, what was the actual reason then? After being incorrectly marked as an adult blog several weeks ago and having her profile picture removed, Avery contacted staff, was told the flagging had been done in error, and had her blog status returned to normal. So evidently, her blog was reviewed by staff and determined not to have broken TOS for having NSFW content. And if the post mentioned was also not the deciding factor, then that was?
Matt thereafter failed to recognize the harm to the community as a result of this suspension.
Again, not the correct language to use here; the community in particular should be specified to be trans women, and this description is again erasing the reality of the situation at hand.
Transition timelines are not against our community guidelines, and weren’t a factor considered by the moderation team when discussing suspensions and subsequent appeals. We do not take action against content that is related to transitioning or trans bodies unless it includes violations of the Community Guidelines.
It's obvious that transition timelines are not against community guidelines, it's the fact that trans women's selfies have been repeatedly wrongly assigned Mature community labels that is being brought to light here.
Prioritizing anti-harassment features that will empower users to more effectively protect themselves from harassment.
Here's the thing.
Obviously, we all know reporting blogs for anything other than sexual content just doesn't do anything. This is a fault of the system (myself and others have experienced numerous just even trying to submit reports in the first place), a fault of the site's content policies (transphobic, racist, antisemitic, and other inflammatory bloggers are protected so soundly by the site's freedom of speech policies that anything they say short of doxxing people is immediately brushed off by moderation staff), and a fault of the people behind the desks (as seen from inequitable moderation and extremely long response times experienced by people trying to clear improperly flagged posts or blogs).
However, reporting blogs en masse for sexual content seems to work very well, so much so that any time a trans woman speaks up on Tumblr a wave of transmisogynists can just spam a deluge of false reports for sexual content and have her disappear overnight.
So, the real question here, is even if a new amazing anti-harassment feature is rolled out, will anything be done to fix the ways in which the existing reporting system is used to target trans bloggers?
Reviewing which of the tags frequently used by the trans community are blocked, and working to make them available next week.
First of all, the tag in question that is at the forefront of this discussion is #tgirl. #tboy isn't blocked, #trans isn't blocked, #tgirl is. This is specifically about trans women.
While this response is marginally better than silence,
It isn't a proper apology, and it isn't any amount of transparency for how trans people and trans women in particular are treated on Tumblr. If anything, this stands to only showcase how trans rights are put on a podium at the forefront of a display of progressive imagery while the actual people on the site are swept under the rug.