people aren't "pro life" theyre "pro birth". a more appropriate term might be "pro takingawaybasichumanrightsfromhalfthepopulation".
if you support the ideals of pro-life, you don't care about human life. you dont care about what happens to that baby after it is born or what pain it will cause the parent/family.
oops hit enter too fast
people who are prolife are uneducated and it fucking shows man. it SHOWS that they dont know what theyre fucking on about.
1 - the foster care system sucks. 1 in 4 children who endured the foster system end up going into a life of crime. the rate of ptsd in foster children is double that of WAR VETS.
2 - if someone does not want a baby, they should not have to have one. it's in the best interest of the child and the family that they do not deliver that child.
3 - a clump of cells that is not capable of thought yet should not be held as more important than the mother/uterus owner
4 - a sa victim shouldn't have to raise and care for a child that was a result of that traumatic incident that RESEMBLES THE PERSON THAT TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THEM.
if youre pro life then you're sick and twisted. it's wrong.
I think my favorite way of designating the two “sides” of this issue are pro-choice and pro-control, for the same reasons you mention. They don’t actually care about what happens to the lives of those already outside of a uterus, they just care about controlling what those with a uterus can do with it.
startle
this topic boils me up so bad
people aren't "pro life" theyre "pro birth". a more appropriate term might be "pro takingawaybasichumanrightsfromhalfthepopulation".
if you support the ideals of pro-life, you don't care about human life. you dont care about what happens to that baby after it is born or what pain it will cause the parent/family.
oops hit enter too fast
people who are prolife are uneducated and it fucking shows man. it SHOWS that they dont know what theyre fucking on about.
1 - the foster care system sucks. 1 in 4 children who endured the foster system end up going into a life of crime. the rate of ptsd in foster children is double that of WAR VETS.
2 - if someone does not want a baby, they should not have to have one. it's in the best interest of the child and the family that they do not deliver that child.
3 - a clump of cells that is not capable of thought yet should not be held as more important than the mother/uterus owner
4 - a sa victim shouldn't have to raise and care for a child that was a result of that traumatic incident that RESEMBLES THE PERSON THAT TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THEM.
if youre pro life then you're sick and twisted. it's wrong.
2 years, 2 days ago Edited 9:12 am
also if choosing not to act on the possibility of life is murder than like
isnt every period murder :skull:
like that egg COULD be the child that COULD be the cure to cancer!!! /s
fr their logic just doesnt make any sense my brain
2 years, 2 days ago
I think my favorite way of designating the two “sides” of this issue are pro-choice and pro-control, for the same reasons you mention. They don’t actually care about what happens to the lives of those already outside of a uterus, they just care about controlling what those with a uterus can do with it.
2 years, 2 days ago