Admins being hypocrites? (CBC discussion)

Posted 4 months, 25 days ago (Edited 15 days, 19 hours ago) by SIGNALIS

Hii so idk how to start this but let’s say what’s up th admins?!

I believe it’s valid to say that doing cbcs (character based characte/character based custom) is a way to sneak into a copyright. Recently half of my cbcs Where nuked.

id have understood that on the first place but…

EDIT: I’m just pointing out that this user has cbcs NOT that they’re an admin.

YOU CAN GET BANNED FROM TOYHOUSE!

I’m not dragging them into drama as stated we are concerned with the moderation not jaywalk

i‘d like to add many popular artists that are friends with admins or just simply popular have done enstars cbc and SOLD them. But of course th has its favorites ❤️

EXAMPLE OF A CBC ACCORDING TO TH RULES

IMG-7570.png

 this is my oc Guadalupe (sorry for the weird censor of the blood ;;)

his bio is that he’s an Angel etc

he’s a cbc based off rinne amagi from the hit game ensemble stars

IMG-7571.webp
picture here for reference

and he still got nuked :,D


edit explaining the situation: I am fully aware the rules states this and that…however this discussion is how the management is applied. As far I’ve seen and aware there’s multiple popular artists selling cbcs for good money (example I literally saw a popular artist sell furry vocaloids) and no one bats an eye while people that follow the rules making sure the cbcs is a completely inspired character gets taken down and removed due to being “fanart”. 

-Admins do not look into the character or if it’s just a furry version as folks that are a system got their alters taken down (correct me if I’m using the wrong words I just felt that was very disrespectful from the admins).

might As well sell cbcs since it’s “fanart” and I’m just making merch 😝

List of alternatives!

I know this about CBCs but it’s all

About the admin being weird. 

LINK OF THE THREAD ABOUT BANNED ACCOUNTS

- Toyhouse alternative for cbcs here made by King-Monhwa! https://cbc-gardens.net

-another alternative https://loreforge.co more directed to pc and writers yet offers good features and a premium like th for customization 👍


SIGNALIS

P0WER they’re both based of jun sazanami from enstars! https://ensemble-stars.fandom.com/wiki/Jun_Sazanami

MechanicalHoundz

The CBC debate always scares me, because it seems like one character that's 100% "this dude but a furry" can pass while a character that clearly is only based on a character can get hit with the deletion beam.

I will say it is a little dumb that there's people who're close to positions of power that can get away with this.

SIGNALIS

Okay i‘ll also like to add my Ticket got replied. Basically tips are just say the character is cbc yet @0_0 pointed out something really important 

like what about the Pokémon adopts? 

honestly yeah I agree with everyone’s comments. Copyright or not people always sell merchandise of franchises, maybe it is needed an update of that rule because I agree there’s sometimes it’s a carbon copy of a design ~_~

I also like to add that making a masked character profile is also a good idea but still doesn’t apply to Pokémon based ,  mlp based adopts, Enstars based adopts…. Etctec

-

Rylio

I 100% agree. I've had CBC/kinsonas before for them to get removed, only to turn around and see a shit ton other CBC/kinsonas not removed and left up for years. If they're going to remove characters over that rule, they need to start actually enforcing it.

tavvy

The difference between Pokémon ocs and cbc characters are very different. Making a character based off ash’s pikachu old be a kinsona/cbc but making a pikachu oc is their own thing because pikachu are a species of creature so there are many pikachu but one ash pikachu if that makes sense. Like there is one Spyro the dragon but there are many dragons as a species.