Comments on Raccoony All Comments Start of Thread Parent

Sorry for the late reply!! Assuming you mean allowing the character's worth to represent currency and using that to indirectly sell / three way trades, I'm completely fine with such as long as the price is not being inflated in the process. Please correct me if I misunderstand the question :3c

well i somewhat mean that, in the sense that for ex i wanted to get another character   but i only have a char i traded for, but i could (theoretically) trade that char for the money for that other character 

oh that's fine!! Like mentioned, as long as the character's worth isn't being unfairly increased that'd be perfectly valid ^.^ it'd be essentially the equivalent of trading directly, which I have no rules against

mk! just been thinking if i dont connect with pip then i might voucher them off as i was planning on selling (the niice design) them
but i might not bc i really do like them, would pip be worth around 50$? (im just asking just in case) 

oh, no, unfortunately the worth would have to remain as the AB price ($37) because a single exception might result in convoluting an entire chain of character worths (eventually adding up to be higher than the initial price without added art)! ;___; thank you for clarifying with me, however - it's very appreciated T . T

actually - I gave it some further thought and I decided the previous rule was just a poor way to handle consistency; it would be unfair to determine the value on something that's unlikely to happen down the line 3 As the original owner, you can sell pip for $50 if you desire!! tysm for checking in with me c:

mk! thank you!