The two stand motionless for a few moments, studying the figure standing before them, studying it as a natural phenomenon, just as they would study a creek - no surprise, no curiosity of how it got there, just on what it is.
"How immoral it is, an apathetic assassin. It is one thing to be a relished assassin - reveling in it, indulging in murder as if there were no divine punishment, no God, no Justice, it's even to be expected, but, one who treats it, of course, selfishly, as a necessary evil.. No doubt he is abject." The horror quietly begins, seemingly to itself, before turning to the one beside it, expecting a response, but with no particular interest in what its companion will say - for, of course, it must say something, they're dialectic creatures.
"But, so particularly abject for it to be of note?", The second one returns, "On the grounds of immorality, is not the very concept of 'assassin' as a career immoral? The behavior of the assassin himself has little to do with it. The very worst assassins may indeed have the traits of the latter - indifference -, but, ah... I imagine consistency cannot exist on a case-by-case basis, hm? Punish all assassins equally - all as murderers, no such thing as a 'less immoral' assassin.."
The first one inevitably replies - "What you say may be true," - all attention directed towards the physical subject of their discussion had halted. -"but it is unreasonable to treat the two instances as the same, seeing how manifestly different they are. It reflects on the assassin's psyche, but, of course, if the end punishment is the same, perhaps it is all for nothing."
"How strange."
"Yes."
"And what of you?", both turning back towards the being that sparked this discussion, "Your input?"