Fandom/Kins Rules Update Feedback Box

Posted 5 years, 1 month ago (Edited 5 years, 1 month ago) by admin
This will be left up for a few days so everyone can have a chance to get their thoughts in.

I'm currently reviewing a change in our fandom character ruleset in light of feedback regarding fandom characters. This was supposed to be a reply to the following thread, but I thought it'd be better to split it off into an official thread for better visibility: https://toyhou.se/~forums/14.suggestions-bugs/95652.-rules-edit-kin-characters-albums

To clarify, our current rules do not disallow upload of fan-characters as long as the canon permits derivative content, the characters are correctly credited, and all fanart is being used with permission. The reason being that up until now I haven't minded this platform being used for fandom RP. 

I'm up for changing the site rules if fandom characters are a nuisance, but just wanted to verify since there seems to be some confusion: do people want both canon characters and derivative characters banned, or just canon characters? Where these are defined as the following:

  • Canon characters:
    • EG: Re-uploading Naruto with no changes made to his design or history (usually includes GIFs and screenshots from the anime or copy pasted paragraphs from the character's wiki page)
  • Derivative characters:
    • Any characters derivative from canon content - this includes:
      • Explicit redesigns (eg. Naruto as a dog or furry)
      • Characters that're described as an OC or sona but resemble the canon character in both personality and appearance or cosplay them 24/7
      • Personalised playable MCs (eg. customised Kamui/Robin, Frisk, Gudako/Gudao)
      • Personalised pet site/game characters (eg. FlightRising dragons, Neopet/Subeta/ChickenSmoothie pets)
      • Characters belonging to a canon species (eg. pokemon OCs, LOZ OCs) 
      • Characters belonging to a canon setting (eg. BNHA/Hogwarts OCs that use the school uniform taken from canon designs)
    • This is quite a wide range, so if you have specific thoughts on what you find unacceptable or acceptable for a derivative character that'd also help with gauging the community's opinion for the new ruleset.
I won't be making this a poll; please do post if you have feedback even if you just want to add a +1 to banning one or both of the options. 


For people who would prefer not to post in thread but would still like some input, I've popped up a Google form where you can drop off your feedback: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeaQVmEpF1r8vAqEoHomYa7u_2cMcpoXWKBfhVDjpPWaNQwJg/viewform

MICROWBIRD

Going with vampyric's new vote ((basically th same thing i said before but I wanted to make sure i added a little +1 fdshldk)) 

+1 for creating a filter for non-carbon copy fan characters

carbon copy meaning 100% the same design. with no changes in species, etc. exactly the same. 

Shinsou

vampyric Well, this thread is pretty messy. But the original topic is what I was referencing, which is kind of what we need to stay on top of. 

I don’t personally believe a filter will fix it. It’ll just make it easier for people to find and bother content creators of parody designs. As well as report the designs. 

Tarning

I'd disagree with filtering fan ocs. I don't own any and I'm not particularly interested in seeing them, but if seeing them bothers you so much that you need to FILTER them, then i'd say you just need to get over yourself and grow up. Seeing someone elses fan character does you no harm...
either way, that's not the point of this thread

ban canon and explicit redesigns.
ive never seen 'Characters that're described as an OC or sona but resemble the canon character in both personality and appearance or cosplay them 24/7' but ban those too.
leave everything else alone >>

Oujiton

+1 on what Jayden said

-1 on filter, it's a useless idea

MoonLotus-Hime

-1 on Filter. What point really. Still gonna cuz prob later.:/

Def +1 what Jayden said.

Lilina

I agree with the others about the filter thing, and yeah, I disagree with having a filter because it just won't be very helpful imo, considering that blocking characters is already a thing. (Also agreeing with Jayden)

Now that things are starting to get a little more heated, I'll have to say that this thread was only created as a feedback box, NOT a thread to start causing fire here and there. Me and others have already said this, but can we at least chillax and stop throwing insults at each other?

lillywise

-1 to a filter;

+1 to what jayden said. a filter fixes nothing and would eventually just be useless when you can already block characters you don't want to see. 

AlleycatIrony

-1 on the filter